Tonus
06-21-2011, 03:06 PM
I'm remembering the number of times we were warned that Iraq and/or Afghanistan would be our "next Vietnam." But I'm thinking that Libya right now is closer to filling that description, at least in terms of the early going. Obama has insisted that we aren't at war, and therefore he is not restricted by the War Powers Act (and thus does not have to get an okay from Congress). In spite of this, our forces in Libya are drawing hazard pay (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/20/airmen-sailors-in-libya-receiving-imminent-danger-pay-despite-wh-claim-of-no-legal-hostilities/).
It seems as if NATO forces are doing just enough to enforce a stalemate that leaves Khaddafi's forces in control of around 2/3rds of the country and possibly poised to draw out the conflict, knowing that pressure will mount on NATO to get more directly involved (ie, ground forces) or pack up and leave. And the big question is, will Obama push for greater involvement, which might lead to eventual deployment of US ground forces? Or will he be willing to turn his back on his own statements regarding the import of this 'mission' and deal with what could be a PR and diplomatic disaster?
It seems as if NATO forces are doing just enough to enforce a stalemate that leaves Khaddafi's forces in control of around 2/3rds of the country and possibly poised to draw out the conflict, knowing that pressure will mount on NATO to get more directly involved (ie, ground forces) or pack up and leave. And the big question is, will Obama push for greater involvement, which might lead to eventual deployment of US ground forces? Or will he be willing to turn his back on his own statements regarding the import of this 'mission' and deal with what could be a PR and diplomatic disaster?